作者: Suvaditya Mukherjee
创建日期: 2022/11/03
最后修改: 2022/11/05
描述: 训练卷积模型以分类由特定刺激引起的脑电图信号。
以下示例探讨了如何构建一个基于卷积的神经网络来对在不同刺激下捕获的脑电图信号进行分类。 我们从头开始训练一个模型,因为这样的信号分类模型在预训练格式中相对稀缺。 我们使用的数据来源于加州大学伯克利分校的生物传感实验室,在同一时间对15名受试者进行了数据收集。 我们的过程如下:
tf.data.Dataset
该示例需要以下外部依赖项(Gdown、Scikit-learn、Pandas、Numpy、Matplotlib)。您可以通过以下命令安装。
Gdown是一个用于从Google Drive下载大文件的外部软件包。要了解更多信息,请参考其 PyPi页面
首先,让我们安装依赖项:
!pip install gdown -q
!pip install sklearn -q
!pip install pandas -q
!pip install numpy -q
!pip install matplotlib -q
接下来,让我们下载数据集。 Gdown软件包使从Google Drive下载数据变得容易:
!gdown 1V5B7Bt6aJm0UHbR7cRKBEK8jx7lYPVuX
!# gdown将下载eeg-data.csv到本地驱动器以供使用。eeg-data.csv的总大小为105.7 MB
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import json
import numpy as np
import keras
from keras import layers
import tensorflow as tf
from sklearn import preprocessing, model_selection
import random
QUALITY_THRESHOLD = 128
BATCH_SIZE = 64
SHUFFLE_BUFFER_SIZE = BATCH_SIZE * 2
正在下载...
来自(原始):https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1V5B7Bt6aJm0UHbR7cRKBEK8jx7lYPVuX
来自(重定向):https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1V5B7Bt6aJm0UHbR7cRKBEK8jx7lYPVuX&confirm=t&uuid=4d50d1e7-44b5-4984-aa04-cb4e08803cb8
目标:/home/fchollet/keras-io/scripts/tmp_3333846/eeg-data.csv
100%|█████████████████████████████████████████| 106M/106M [00:00<00:00, 259MB/s]
eeg-data.csv
读取数据我们使用Pandas库读取eeg-data.csv
文件,并使用.head()
命令显示前5行
eeg = pd.read_csv("eeg-data.csv")
我们从数据集中删除未标记的样本,因为它们对模型没有贡献。我们也对不需要用于训练数据准备的列执行.drop()
操作
unlabeled_eeg = eeg[eeg["label"] == "unlabeled"]
eeg = eeg.loc[eeg["label"] != "unlabeled"]
eeg = eeg.loc[eeg["label"] != "everyone paired"]
eeg.drop(
[
"indra_time",
"Unnamed: 0",
"browser_latency",
"reading_time",
"attention_esense",
"meditation_esense",
"updatedAt",
"createdAt",
],
axis=1,
inplace=True,
)
eeg.reset_index(drop=True, inplace=True)
eeg.head()
id | eeg_power | raw_values | signal_quality | label | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 7 | [56887.0, 45471.0, 20074.0, 5359.0, 22594.0, 7... | [99.0, 96.0, 91.0, 89.0, 91.0, 89.0, 87.0, 93.... | 0 | blinkInstruction |
1 | 5 | [11626.0, 60301.0, 5805.0, 15729.0, 4448.0, 33... | [23.0, 40.0, 64.0, 89.0, 86.0, 33.0, -14.0, -1... | 0 | blinkInstruction |
2 | 1 | [15777.0, 33461.0, 21385.0, 44193.0, 11741.0, ... | [41.0, 26.0, 16.0, 20.0, 34.0, 51.0, 56.0, 55.... | 0 | blinkInstruction |
3 | 13 | [311822.0, 44739.0, 19000.0, 19100.0, 2650.0, ... | [208.0, 198.0, 122.0, 84.0, 161.0, 249.0, 216.... | 0 | blinkInstruction |
4 | 4 | [687393.0, 10289.0, 2942.0, 9874.0, 1059.0, 29... | [129.0, 133.0, 114.0, 105.0, 101.0, 109.0, 99.... | 0 | blinkInstruction |
在数据中,记录的样本根据传感器的校准情况给予一个从0到128的评分(0为最佳,200为最差)。我们根据一个128的任意截止限制过滤值。
def convert_string_data_to_values(value_string):
str_list = json.loads(value_string)
return str_list
eeg["raw_values"] = eeg["raw_values"].apply(convert_string_data_to_values)
eeg = eeg.loc[eeg["signal_quality"] < QUALITY_THRESHOLD]
eeg.head()
id | eeg_power | raw_values | signal_quality | label | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 7 | [56887.0, 45471.0, 20074.0, 5359.0, 22594.0, 7... | [99.0, 96.0, 91.0, 89.0, 91.0, 89.0, 87.0, 93.... | 0 | blinkInstruction |
1 | 5 | [11626.0, 60301.0, 5805.0, 15729.0, 4448.0, 33... | [23.0, 40.0, 64.0, 89.0, 86.0, 33.0, -14.0, -1... | 0 | blinkInstruction |
2 | 1 | [15777.0, 33461.0, 21385.0, 44193.0, 11741.0, ... | [41.0, 26.0, 16.0, 20.0, 34.0, 51.0, 56.0, 55.... | 0 | blinkInstruction |
3 | 13 | [311822.0, 44739.0, 19000.0, 19100.0, 2650.0, ... | [208.0, 198.0, 122.0, 84.0, 161.0, 249.0, 216.... | 0 | blinkInstruction |
4 | 4 | [687393.0, 10289.0, 2942.0, 9874.0, 1059.0, 29... | [129.0, 133.0, 114.0, 105.0, 101.0, 109.0, 99.... | 0 | blinkInstruction |
我们可视化数据中的一个样本,以理解刺激引发的信号的样子。
def view_eeg_plot(idx):
data = eeg.loc[idx, "raw_values"]
plt.plot(data)
plt.title(f"样本随机图")
plt.show()
view_eeg_plot(7)
数据中总共有67个不同的标签,其中有编号的子标签。我们根据它们的编号将它们整理为一个标签,并在数据中进行替换。按照此过程,我们执行简单的标签编码以将它们转换为整数格式。 print("替换标签前") print(eeg["label"].unique(), "\n") print(len(eeg["label"].unique()), "\n")
eeg.replace( { "label": { "blink1": "blink", "blink2": "blink", "blink3": "blink", "blink4": "blink", "blink5": "blink", "math1": "math", "math2": "math", "math3": "math", "math4": "math", "math5": "math", "math6": "math", "math7": "math", "math8": "math", "math9": "math", "math10": "math", "math11": "math", "math12": "math", "thinkOfItems-ver1": "thinkOfItems", "thinkOfItems-ver2": "thinkOfItems", "video-ver1": "video", "video-ver2": "video", "thinkOfItemsInstruction-ver1": "thinkOfItemsInstruction", "thinkOfItemsInstruction-ver2": "thinkOfItemsInstruction", "colorRound1-1": "colorRound1", "colorRound1-2": "colorRound1", "colorRound1-3": "colorRound1", "colorRound1-4": "colorRound1", "colorRound1-5": "colorRound1", "colorRound1-6": "colorRound1", "colorRound2-1": "colorRound2", "colorRound2-2": "colorRound2", "colorRound2-3": "colorRound2", "colorRound2-4": "colorRound2", "colorRound2-5": "colorRound2", "colorRound2-6": "colorRound2", "colorRound3-1": "colorRound3", "colorRound3-2": "colorRound3", "colorRound3-3": "colorRound3", "colorRound3-4": "colorRound3", "colorRound3-5": "colorRound3", "colorRound3-6": "colorRound3", "colorRound4-1": "colorRound4", "colorRound4-2": "colorRound4", "colorRound4-3": "colorRound4", "colorRound4-4": "colorRound4", "colorRound4-5": "colorRound4", "colorRound4-6": "colorRound4", "colorRound5-1": "colorRound5", "colorRound5-2": "colorRound5", "colorRound5-3": "colorRound5", "colorRound5-4": "colorRound5", "colorRound5-5": "colorRound5", "colorRound5-6": "colorRound5", "colorInstruction1": "colorInstruction", "colorInstruction2": "colorInstruction", "readyRound1": "readyRound", "readyRound2": "readyRound", "readyRound3": "readyRound", "readyRound4": "readyRound", "readyRound5": "readyRound", "colorRound1": "colorRound", "colorRound2": "colorRound", "colorRound3": "colorRound", "colorRound4": "colorRound", "colorRound5": "colorRound", } }, inplace=True, )
print("替换标签后") print(eeg["label"].unique()) print(len(eeg["label"].unique()))
le = preprocessing.LabelEncoder() # 生成查找表 le.fit(eeg["label"]) eeg["label"] = le.transform(eeg["label"])
<div class="k-default-codeblock">
替换标签之前 ['blinkInstruction' 'blink1' 'blink2' 'blink3' 'blink4' 'blink5' 'relaxInstruction' 'relax' 'mathInstruction' 'math1' 'math2' 'math3' 'math4' 'math5' 'math6' 'math7' 'math8' 'math9' 'math10' 'math11' 'math12' 'musicInstruction' 'music' 'videoInstruction' 'video-ver1' 'thinkOfItemsInstruction-ver1' 'thinkOfItems-ver1' 'colorInstruction1' 'colorInstruction2' 'readyRound1' 'colorRound1-1' 'colorRound1-2' 'colorRound1-3' 'colorRound1-4' 'colorRound1-5' 'colorRound1-6' 'readyRound2' 'colorRound2-1' 'colorRound2-2' 'colorRound2-3' 'colorRound2-4' 'colorRound2-5' 'colorRound2-6' 'readyRound3' 'colorRound3-1' 'colorRound3-2' 'colorRound3-3' 'colorRound3-4' 'colorRound3-5' 'colorRound3-6' 'readyRound4' 'colorRound4-1' 'colorRound4-2' 'colorRound4-3' 'colorRound4-4' 'colorRound4-5' 'colorRound4-6' 'readyRound5' 'colorRound5-1' 'colorRound5-2' 'colorRound5-3' 'colorRound5-4' 'colorRound5-5' 'colorRound5-6' 'video-ver2' 'thinkOfItemsInstruction-ver2' 'thinkOfItems-ver2']
</div>
<div class="k-default-codeblock">
67
</div>
<div class="k-default-codeblock">
替换标签之后 ['blinkInstruction' 'blink' 'relaxInstruction' 'relax' 'mathInstruction' 'math' 'musicInstruction' 'music' 'videoInstruction' 'video' 'thinkOfItemsInstruction' 'thinkOfItems' 'colorInstruction' 'readyRound' 'colorRound1' 'colorRound2' 'colorRound3' 'colorRound4' 'colorRound5'] 19
</div>
我们提取数据中唯一类别的数量
```python
num_classes = len(eeg["label"].unique())
print(num_classes)
19
我们现在使用柱状图可视化每个类别中样本的数量。
plt.bar(range(num_classes), eeg["label"].value_counts())
plt.title("每个类别的样本数量")
plt.show()
我们执行简单的最小-最大缩放,将值范围缩放到0到1之间。我们不使用标准缩放,因为数据不遵循高斯分布。
scaler = preprocessing.MinMaxScaler()
series_list = [
scaler.fit_transform(np.asarray(i).reshape(-1, 1)) for i in eeg["raw_values"]
]
labels_list = [i for i in eeg["label"]]
我们现在创建一个15%保留集的训练-测试拆分。在此之后,我们将数据重塑为长度为512的序列。我们还将标签从当前的标签编码形式转换为独热编码,以便能够使用多种不同的keras.metrics
函数。
x_train, x_test, y_train, y_test = model_selection.train_test_split(
series_list, labels_list, test_size=0.15, random_state=42, shuffle=True
)
print(
f"x_train的长度 : {len(x_train)}\nx_test的长度 : {len(x_test)}\ny_train的长度 : {len(y_train)}\ny_test的长度 : {len(y_test)}"
)
x_train = np.asarray(x_train).astype(np.float32).reshape(-1, 512, 1)
y_train = np.asarray(y_train).astype(np.float32).reshape(-1, 1)
y_train = keras.utils.to_categorical(y_train)
x_test = np.asarray(x_test).astype(np.float32).reshape(-1, 512, 1)
y_test = np.asarray(y_test).astype(np.float32).reshape(-1, 1)
y_test = keras.utils.to_categorical(y_test)
x_train的长度 : 8460
x_test的长度 : 1494
y_train的长度 : 8460
y_test的长度 : 1494
tf.data.Dataset
我们现在从这些数据创建一个tf.data.Dataset
以准备进行训练。我们还将数据打乱并分批,以便后续使用。
train_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((x_train, y_train))
test_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((x_test, y_test))
train_dataset = train_dataset.shuffle(SHUFFLE_BUFFER_SIZE).batch(BATCH_SIZE)
test_dataset = test_dataset.batch(BATCH_SIZE)
从每个类别样本数量的图中可以看出,数据集是不平衡的。因此,我们计算每个类别的权重,以确保模型在没有特定类别偏好(因样本数量较多)的情况下公平训练。
我们使用一种朴素的方法来计算这些权重,找到每个类别的反比例并将其用作权重。
vals_dict = {}
for i in eeg["label"]:
if i in vals_dict.keys():
vals_dict[i] += 1
else:
vals_dict[i] = 1
total = sum(vals_dict.values())
# 使用的公式 - 朴素方法,其中
# 权重 = 1 - (样本数量 / 总样本数量)
# 所以样本越多,权重越低
weight_dict = {k: (1 - (v / total)) for k, v in vals_dict.items()}
print(weight_dict)
{1: 0.9872413100261201, 0: 0.975989551938919, 14: 0.9841269841269842, 13: 0.9061683745228049, 9: 0.9838255977496484, 8: 0.9059674502712477, 11: 0.9847297568816556, 10: 0.9063692987743621, 18: 0.9838255977496484, 17: 0.9057665260196905, 16: 0.9373116335141651, 15: 0.9065702230259193, 2: 0.9211372312638135, 12: 0.9525818766325096, 3: 0.9245529435402853, 4: 0.943841671689773, 5: 0.9641350210970464, 6: 0.981514968856741, 7: 0.9443439823186659}
keras.callbacks.History
对象中所有的指标def plot_history_metrics(history: keras.callbacks.History):
total_plots = len(history.history)
cols = total_plots // 2
rows = total_plots // cols
if total_plots % cols != 0:
rows += 1
pos = range(1, total_plots + 1)
plt.figure(figsize=(15, 10))
for i, (key, value) in enumerate(history.history.items()):
plt.subplot(rows, cols, pos[i])
plt.plot(range(len(value)), value)
plt.title(str(key))
plt.show()
def create_model():
input_layer = keras.Input(shape=(512, 1))
x = layers.Conv1D(
filters=32, kernel_size=3, strides=2, activation="relu", padding="same"
)(input_layer)
x = layers.BatchNormalization()(x)
x = layers.Conv1D(
filters=64, kernel_size=3, strides=2, activation="relu", padding="same"
)(x)
x = layers.BatchNormalization()(x)
x = layers.Conv1D(
filters=128, kernel_size=5, strides=2, activation="relu", padding="same"
)(x)
x = layers.BatchNormalization()(x)
x = layers.Conv1D(
filters=256, kernel_size=5, strides=2, activation="relu", padding="same"
)(x)
x = layers.BatchNormalization()(x)
x = layers.Conv1D(
filters=512, kernel_size=7, strides=2, activation="relu", padding="same"
)(x)
x = layers.BatchNormalization()(x)
x = layers.Conv1D(
filters=1024,
kernel_size=7,
strides=2,
activation="relu",
padding="same",
)(x)
x = layers.BatchNormalization()(x)
x = layers.Dropout(0.2)(x)
x = layers.Flatten()(x)
x = layers.Dense(4096, activation="relu")(x)
x = layers.Dropout(0.2)(x)
x = layers.Dense(
2048, activation="relu", kernel_regularizer=keras.regularizers.L2()
)(x)
x = layers.Dropout(0.2)(x)
x = layers.Dense(
1024, activation="relu", kernel_regularizer=keras.regularizers.L2()
)(x)
x = layers.Dropout(0.2)(x)
x = layers.Dense(
128, activation="relu", kernel_regularizer=keras.regularizers.L2()
)(x)
output_layer = layers.Dense(num_classes, activation="softmax")(x)
return keras.Model(inputs=input_layer, outputs=output_layer)
conv_model = create_model()
conv_model.summary()
模型: "functional_1"
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ ┃ 层 (类型) ┃ 输出形状 ┃ 参数 # ┃ ┡━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━┩ │ input_layer (InputLayer) │ (None, 512, 1) │ 0 │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ conv1d (Conv1D) │ (None, 256, 32) │ 128 │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ batch_normalization │ (None, 256, 32) │ 128 │ │ (BatchNormalization) │ │ │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ conv1d_1 (Conv1D) │ (None, 128, 64) │ 6,208 │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ batch_normalization_1 │ (None, 128, 64) │ 256 │ │ (BatchNormalization) │ │ │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ conv1d_2 (Conv1D) │ (None, 64, 128) │ 41,088 │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ batch_normalization_2 │ (None, 64, 128) │ 512 │ │ (BatchNormalization) │ │ │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ conv1d_3 (Conv1D) │ (None, 32, 256) │ 164,096 │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ batch_normalization_3 │ (None, 32, 256) │ 1,024 │ │ (BatchNormalization) │ │ │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ conv1d_4 (Conv1D) │ (None, 16, 512) │ 918,016 │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ batch_normalization_4 │ (None, 16, 512) │ 2,048 │ │ (BatchNormalization) │ │ │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ conv1d_5 (Conv1D) │ (None, 8, 1024) │ 3,671,040 │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ batch_normalization_5 │ (无, 8, 1024) │ 4,096 │ │ (BatchNormalization) │ │ │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ dropout (Dropout) │ (无, 8, 1024) │ 0 │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ flatten (Flatten) │ (无, 8192) │ 0 │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ dense (Dense) │ (无, 4096) │ 33,558,528 │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ dropout_1 (Dropout) │ (无, 4096) │ 0 │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ dense_1 (Dense) │ (无, 2048) │ 8,390,656 │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ dropout_2 (Dropout) │ (无, 2048) │ 0 │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ dense_2 (Dense) │ (无, 1024) │ 2,098,176 │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ dropout_3 (Dropout) │ (无, 1024) │ 0 │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ dense_3 (Dense) │ (无, 128) │ 131,200 │ ├─────────────────────────────────┼───────────────────────────┼────────────┤ │ dense_4 (Dense) │ (无, 19) │ 2,451 │ └─────────────────────────────────┴───────────────────────────┴────────────┘
总参数: 48,989,651 (186.88 MB)
可训练参数: 48,985,619 (186.87 MB)
非可训练参数: 4,032 (15.75 KB)
我们在经过广泛实验后将训练轮数设置为30。 经过早停分析后发现这是最优的轮数。 我们定义了一个模型检查点回调,以确保我们只获得最佳的模型权重。 我们还定义了一个ReduceLROnPlateau,因为在实验过程中发现了几个 在某一特定点后损失停滞的情况。另一方面,直接的LRScheduler发现 在衰减方面太过激进。
epochs = 30
callbacks = [
keras.callbacks.ModelCheckpoint(
"best_model.keras", save_best_only=True, monitor="loss"
),
keras.callbacks.ReduceLROnPlateau(
monitor="val_top_k_categorical_accuracy",
factor=0.2,
patience=2,
min_lr=0.000001,
),
]
optimizer = keras.optimizers.Adam(amsgrad=True, learning_rate=0.001)
loss = keras.losses.CategoricalCrossentropy()
model.fit()
我们使用Adam
优化器,因为它通常被认为是初步训练的最佳选择,并且发现它是最佳优化器。
我们使用CategoricalCrossentropy
作为损失,因为我们的标签是独热编码形式。
我们定义TopKCategoricalAccuracy(k=3)
、AUC
、Precision
和Recall
指标以
进一步帮助更好地理解模型。
conv_model.compile(
optimizer=optimizer,
loss=loss,
metrics=[
keras.metrics.TopKCategoricalAccuracy(k=3),
keras.metrics.AUC(),
keras.metrics.Precision(),
keras.metrics.Recall(),
],
)
conv_model_history = conv_model.fit(
train_dataset,
epochs=epochs,
callbacks=callbacks,
validation_data=test_dataset,
class_weight=weight_dict,
)
Epoch 1/30
8/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 1s 16ms/step - auc: 0.5550 - loss: 45.5990 - precision: 0.0183 - recall: 0.0049 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.2154
WARNING: All log messages before absl::InitializeLog() is called are written to STDERR
I0000 00:00:1699421521.552287 4412 device_compiler.h:186] Compiled cluster using XLA! This line is logged at most once for the lifetime of the process.
W0000 00:00:1699421521.578522 4412 graph_launch.cc:671] Fallback to op-by-op mode because memset node breaks graph update
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 0s 134ms/step - auc: 0.6119 - loss: 24.8582 - precision: 0.0465 - recall: 0.0022 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.2479
W0000 00:00:1699421539.207966 4409 graph_launch.cc:671] Fallback to op-by-op mode because memset node breaks graph update
W0000 00:00:1699421541.374400 4408 graph_launch.cc:671] Fallback to op-by-op mode because memset node breaks graph update
W0000 00:00:1699421542.991471 4406 graph_launch.cc:671] Fallback to op-by-op mode because memset node breaks graph update
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 44s 180ms/step - auc: 0.6122 - loss: 24.7734 - precision: 0.0466 - recall: 0.0022 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.2481 - val_auc: 0.6470 - val_loss: 4.1950 - val_precision: 0.0000e+00 - val_recall: 0.0000e+00 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.2610 - learning_rate: 0.0010
Epoch 2/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.6958 - loss: 3.5651 - precision: 0.0000e+00 - recall: 0.0000e+00 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3162 - val_auc: 0.6364 - val_loss: 3.3169 - val_precision: 0.0000e+00 - val_recall: 0.0000e+00 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.2436 - learning_rate: 0.0010
Epoch 3/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.7068 - loss: 2.8805 - precision: 0.1910 - recall: 1.2846e-04 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3220 - val_auc: 0.6313 - val_loss: 3.0662 - val_precision: 0.0000e+00 - val_recall: 0.0000e+00 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.2503 - learning_rate: 0.0010
Epoch 4/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.7370 - loss: 2.6265 - precision: 0.0719 - recall: 2.8215e-04 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3572 - val_auc: 0.5952 - val_loss: 3.1744 - val_precision: 0.0000e+00 - val_recall: 0.0000e+00 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.2282 - learning_rate: 2.0000e-04
Epoch 5/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 9s 65ms/step - auc: 0.7703 - loss: 2.4886 - precision: 0.3738 - recall: 0.0022 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.4029 - val_auc: 0.6320 - val_loss: 3.3036 - val_precision: 0.0000e+00 - val_recall: 0.0000e+00 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.2564 - learning_rate: 2.0000e-04
Epoch 6/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 9s 66ms/step - auc: 0.8187 - loss: 2.3009 - precision: 0.6264 - recall: 0.0082 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.4852 - val_auc: 0.6743 - val_loss: 3.4905 - val_precision: 0.1957 - val_recall: 0.0060 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3179 - learning_rate: 4.0000e-05
Epoch 7/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.8577 - loss: 2.1272 - precision: 0.6079 - recall: 0.0307 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.5553 - val_auc: 0.6674 - val_loss: 3.8436 - val_precision: 0.2184 - val_recall: 0.0127 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3286 - learning_rate: 4.0000e-05
Epoch 8/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.8875 - loss: 1.9671 - precision: 0.6614 - recall: 0.0580 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.6400 - val_auc: 0.6577 - val_loss: 4.2607 - val_precision: 0.2212 - val_recall: 0.0167 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3186 - learning_rate: 4.0000e-05
Epoch 9/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.9143 - loss: 1.7926 - precision: 0.6770 - recall: 0.0992 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.7189 - val_auc: 0.6465 - val_loss: 4.8088 - val_precision: 0.1780 - val_recall: 0.0228 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3112 - learning_rate: 4.0000e-05
Epoch 10/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.9347 - loss: 1.6323 - precision: 0.6741 - recall: 0.1508 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.7832 - val_auc: 0.6483 - val_loss: 4.8556 - val_precision: 0.2424 - val_recall: 0.0268 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3072 - learning_rate: 8.0000e-06
Epoch 11/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 9s 64ms/step - auc: 0.9442 - loss: 1.5469 - precision: 0.6985 - recall: 0.1855 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8095 - val_auc: 0.6443 - val_loss: 5.0003 - val_precision: 0.2216 - val_recall: 0.0288 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3052 - learning_rate: 8.0000e-06
Epoch 12/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 9s 64ms/step - auc: 0.9490 - loss: 1.4935 - precision: 0.7196 - recall: 0.2063 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8293 - val_auc: 0.6411 - val_loss: 5.0008 - val_precision: 0.2383 - val_recall: 0.0341 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3112 - learning_rate: 1.6000e-06
Epoch 13/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 9s 65ms/step - auc: 0.9514 - loss: 1.4739 - precision: 0.7071 - recall: 0.2147 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8371 - val_auc: 0.6411 - val_loss: 5.0279 - val_precision: 0.2356 - val_recall: 0.0355 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3126 - learning_rate: 1.6000e-06
Epoch 14/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 2s 14ms/step - auc: 0.9512 - loss: 1.4739 - precision: 0.7102 - recall: 0.2141 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8349 - val_auc: 0.6407 - val_loss: 5.0457 - val_precision: 0.2340 - val_recall: 0.0368 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3099 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
Epoch 15/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 9s 64ms/step - auc: 0.9533 - loss: 1.4524 - precision: 0.7206 - recall: 0.2240 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8421 - val_auc: 0.6400 - val_loss: 5.0557 - val_precision: 0.2292 - val_recall: 0.0368 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3092 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
Epoch 16/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.9536 - loss: 1.4489 - precision: 0.7201 - recall: 0.2218 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8367 - val_auc: 0.6401 - val_loss: 5.0850 - val_precision: 0.2336 - val_recall: 0.0382 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3072 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
Epoch 17/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.9542 - loss: 1.4429 - precision: 0.7207 - recall: 0.2353 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8404 - val_auc: 0.6397 - val_loss: 5.1047 - val_precision: 0.2249 - val_recall: 0.0375 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3086 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
Epoch 18/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.9547 - loss: 1.4353 - precision: 0.7195 - recall: 0.2323 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8455 - val_auc: 0.6389 - val_loss: 5.1215 - val_precision: 0.2305 - val_recall: 0.0395 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3072 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
Epoch 19/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.9554 - loss: 1.4271 - precision: 0.7254 - recall: 0.2326 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8492 - val_auc: 0.6386 - val_loss: 5.1395 - val_precision: 0.2269 - val_recall: 0.0395 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3072 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
Epoch 20/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.9559 - loss: 1.4221 - precision: 0.7248 - recall: 0.2471 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8439 - val_auc: 0.6385 - val_loss: 5.1655 - val_precision: 0.2264 - val_recall: 0.0402 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3052 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
Epoch 21/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 64ms/step - auc: 0.9565 - loss: 1.4170 - precision: 0.7169 - recall: 0.2421 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8543 - val_auc: 0.6385 - val_loss: 5.1851 - val_precision: 0.2271 - val_recall: 0.0415 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3072 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
Epoch 22/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.9577 - loss: 1.4029 - precision: 0.7305 - recall: 0.2518 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8536 - val_auc: 0.6384 - val_loss: 5.2043 - val_precision: 0.2279 - val_recall: 0.0415 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3059 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
Epoch 23/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.9574 - loss: 1.4048 - precision: 0.7285 - recall: 0.2575 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8527 - val_auc: 0.6382 - val_loss: 5.2247 - val_precision: 0.2308 - val_recall: 0.0442 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3106 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
Epoch 24/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.9579 - loss: 1.3998 - precision: 0.7426 - recall: 0.2588 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8503 - val_auc: 0.6386 - val_loss: 5.2479 - val_precision: 0.2308 - val_recall: 0.0442 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3092 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
Epoch 25/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.9585 - loss: 1.3918 - precision: 0.7348 - recall: 0.2609 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8607 - val_auc: 0.6378 - val_loss: 5.2648 - val_precision: 0.2287 - val_recall: 0.0448 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3106 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
Epoch 26/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.9587 - loss: 1.3881 - precision: 0.7425 - recall: 0.2669 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8544 - val_auc: 0.6380 - val_loss: 5.2877 - val_precision: 0.2226 - val_recall: 0.0448 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3099 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
Epoch 27/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.9590 - loss: 1.3834 - precision: 0.7469 - recall: 0.2665 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8599 - val_auc: 0.6379 - val_loss: 5.3021 - val_precision: 0.2252 - val_recall: 0.0455 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3072 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
Epoch 28/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 64ms/step - auc: 0.9597 - loss: 1.3763 - precision: 0.7600 - recall: 0.2701 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8628 - val_auc: 0.6380 - val_loss: 5.3241 - val_precision: 0.2244 - val_recall: 0.0469 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3119 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
Epoch 29/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.9601 - loss: 1.3692 - precision: 0.7549 - recall: 0.2761 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8634 - val_auc: 0.6372 - val_loss: 5.3494 - val_precision: 0.2229 - val_recall: 0.0469 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3119 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
Epoch 30/30
133/133 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 8s 63ms/step - auc: 0.9604 - loss: 1.3694 - precision: 0.7447 - recall: 0.2723 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.8648 - val_auc: 0.6372 - val_loss: 5.3667 - val_precision: 0.2226 - val_recall: 0.0475 - val_top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3119 - learning_rate: 1.0000e-06
我们使用上述定义的函数查看训练期间的模型指标。
plot_history_metrics(conv_model_history)
loss, accuracy, auc, precision, recall = conv_model.evaluate(test_dataset)
print(f"损失 : {loss}")
print(f"前 3 类别准确率 : {accuracy}")
print(f"曲线下面积 (ROC) : {auc}")
print(f"精确度 : {precision}")
print(f"召回率 : {recall}")
def view_evaluated_eeg_plots(model):
start_index = random.randint(10, len(eeg))
end_index = start_index + 11
data = eeg.loc[start_index:end_index, "raw_values"]
data_array = [scaler.fit_transform(np.asarray(i).reshape(-1, 1)) for i in data]
data_array = [np.asarray(data_array).astype(np.float32).reshape(-1, 512, 1)]
original_labels = eeg.loc[start_index:end_index, "label"]
predicted_labels = np.argmax(model.predict(data_array, verbose=0), axis=1)
original_labels = [
le.inverse_transform(np.array(label).reshape(-1))[0]
for label in original_labels
]
predicted_labels = [
le.inverse_transform(np.array(label).reshape(-1))[0]
for label in predicted_labels
]
total_plots = 12
cols = total_plots // 3
rows = total_plots // cols
if total_plots % cols != 0:
rows += 1
pos = range(1, total_plots + 1)
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(20, 10))
for i, (plot_data, og_label, pred_label) in enumerate(
zip(data, original_labels, predicted_labels)
):
plt.subplot(rows, cols, pos[i])
plt.plot(plot_data)
plt.title(f"实际标签 : {og_label}\n预测标签 : {pred_label}")
fig.subplots_adjust(hspace=0.5)
plt.show()
view_evaluated_eeg_plots(conv_model)
24/24 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 0s 4ms/step - auc: 0.6438 - loss: 5.3150 - precision: 0.2589 - recall: 0.0565 - top_k_categorical_accuracy: 0.3281
损失 : 5.366718769073486
前 3 类别准确率 : 0.6372398138046265
曲线下面积 (ROC) : 0.222570538520813
精确度 : 0.04752342775464058
召回率 : 0.311914324760437
W0000 00:00:1699421785.101645 4408 graph_launch.cc:671] 回退到逐操作模式,因为 memset 节点破坏了图更新